Search This Blog

Saturday, March 5, 2022

Thinking Activity

Bridge Course: War Poetry  

This thinking Activity given by our Professor veidehi Ma'am. Here i discuss about the what is war poetry.
      

1) What is your understanding of war poetry?  

Reminding us of William Wordsworth's (1770-1850) dictum that "poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings", Jon Stallworthy (1935-2014) asserted that..

there can be no area of human experience that has generated a wider range of powerful feelings than war: hope and fear; exhilaration; hatred – not only for the enemy, but also for generals, politicians, and war-profiteers; love – for fellow soldiers, for women and children left behind, for country (often) and cause (occasionally). 

During the Great War, poetry had a currency that it lacks in the early twenty-first century. Newspapers, magazines, pamphlets, anthologies, and individual collections featured poems by combatants and non-combatants, by men and by women, at "home" or near the front lines. Poetry seemed a natural outlet for the intense emotions generated by the war and its range challenges the concept that only those with direct experience of fighting, i.e. soldiers, were allowed to write about war. The Great War was a total war and no one was left untouched by it. Suffering, mourning, patriotism, pity, and love were universally, if not equally, experienced. Thus "war poetry" is as all-encompassing as total war itself. 

War poetry is a literary genre that developed during the period of the world wars. The term was coined by Randall Jarrell in his essay “The Literature of War” (1961). Jarrell defines war poetry as “a poem that has as its theme war and that is written during or about a war. List of War Poets in English Literature- It’s important to study War poetry because it gives us insight into the actual scenario of war during World War I and II. Most of the poets of that time considered themselves as soldiers as well as poets. They used to write poets in their leisure time and express their emotions through writings.
 
What is a War Poet? 
     

A War poet is a poet who participates in a war and writes about their experiences or non-combatants who writes poems about war. These war poets are also called trench poets.

The term war poetry chiefly denotes the poetry written under the direct impact of World War I. It is also called anti-romantic. Earlier also we had war poets but after World War I these kinds of poet and poetry comes under the genre called ‘War Poetry‘.   

List of War poet's
  • Rupert Brooke
  • Siegfried Sassoon
  • Wilfred Owen
  • Robert Graves
  • Edward Thomas
  • Isaac Rosenberg.  

The theme of War Poetry:
  • The loss of innocence
  • Brotherhood and Relationship
  • The Horror of war
  • Disillusionment with religion
  • Nature
  • Irrationality of war
  • Emotional and feelings 

2.) Note down the difference of all the War Poets.

Ans, 

Wilfred Owen: Owens poems talk about the truth of war. The poems focus on the fear of war, horror, sacrifice, glory and questioning life’s purpose. 

Rupert Brooke: Brooke poems talk about the Love, Death and Immortality. 

Wilfred Wilson Gibson: As a published poet, however, Gibson was driven to imagine and represent the realities of ordinary British soldiers.Adopting the voices of both soldiers and civilians, the poems explore themes of guilt, madness, injury, death, and sense of identity. 
 
Siegfried Sassoon: Siegfried Sassoon is one of the most famous of all the war poets. He was a soldier in WWI and his poem is based on his own experience in the war. 

Ivor Gurney: Ivor Gurney was one of the most famous english poets. Gurney is known both as a poet and composer. he often contrasted the horrors of the front line with the beauty and tranquillity of his native English landscape - these themes were explored in the 2012 musical play A Soldier and a Maker. 

3.) Compare any two poems with reference to the subject, style of writing and patriotism.

Ans,  

1.) The Soldier - RUPERT BROOKE
     

The poem "The Soldier" is one of English poet Rupert Brooke's (1887–1915) most evocative and poignant poems—and an example of the dangers of romanticizing World War I, comforting the survivors but downplaying the grim reality. Written in 1914, the lines are still used in military memorials today. 

Subject of Poem:

You've most likely heard the phrase 'Home is where the heart is.' But you've probably never heard someone express the sentiment quite as literally as Brooke did in 'The Soldier.' In his sonnet, the poet ties his entire being, physical and mental, to England, making the two practically inseparable even in death. 

If I should die, think only this of me:
      That there’s some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England. There shall be
      In that rich earth a richer dust concealed; 

The first line of the poem lays down its opening gambit, implying that people need not grieve the speaker's death for reasons that are about to follow.This poem is deeply patriotic about England—and it's this patriotism that is behind the speaker's logic. He asserts that, when he dies in a far off "foreign field," his fallen body will in turn make wherever he dies a part of England too.Referring to his corpse as being “richer dust” is an interesting choice of words here and perhaps a reference to the phrase used during a funeral service. The classic “ashes to ashes, dust to dust” line. This idea that his body is simply made of dust isn’t necessarily totally symbolic. After all, we are primarily a carbon-based life form! 

A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware,
Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam,
A body of England’s, breathing English air,
Washed by the rivers, blest by the suns of home. 

The dust metaphor continues into the fifth line where the poet talks about how that dust was formed and shaped by England. The concept that he is trying to put across is that he is the very embodiment of England, of course, the wider suggestion is that any soldier who dies for their country fulfills that same criterion. That soldiers are “shaped” by England and so when they die overseas they act almost like a seed, spreading Englishness.

The final three lines of the Octave are full of patriotic notions. They really create an image of England that is fantastic. This is done with the evocation of the natural world. Talking of flowers, the air, and rivers, these all help to create the image of England being a beautiful place. Through doing that the narrator is able to infer that a soldier can help to take the very fragments that helped to create that beauty and transport it to a foreign country. This act, if it were real, would of course be very noble 

And think, this heart, all evil shed away,
A pulse in the eternal mind, no less
Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given; 

The use of language in this stanza is really interesting. It talks of hearts and minds in an attempt to personify England. The reason for doing this is because people have a vested interest in people. If you can humanize a country you can increase its value in the eyes of people.Whilst not referencing England directly its use is very deliberate, it puts the thought of eternity into your mind so you associate that with England. This poem has a sense that England will prevail, that our sovereignty is eternal. 

Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day;
And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness,
In hearts at peace, under an English heaven. 

The final line is very clever. It uses really positive language in order to infer that dying in the field of battle ends up with you being at peace. It results in you ending up in heaven. Not just any heaven though, an English heaven.

Style of Writing:

The Soldier is similar to a Petrarchan sonnet (or Italian Sonnet if you prefer.) This means it has 14 lines which are separated into stanzas. The rhyming pattern for this is not typical of a Petrarchan sonnet, which usually has a ABBAABBA CDECDE pattern. 

Patriotism:

Brooke’s The Soldier is the first of the sonnets to achieve fame, is still probably the most famous of the group, a poem that has become one of the standard pieces of patriotic rhetoric in English literature. “If I should die, think only this of me,” it begins; the speaker will die, it is to be understood, and the poem goes on to describe what will become of this soldier after his death. 

The body of the soldier, whom “England bore, shaped, made-aware,” becomes dust, an English dust, enriching the foreign dust in which it is buried, so that “there’s some corner of a foreign field/That is for ever England.” The poem is Platonic rather than Christian, for the soldier’s body does not await resurrection but becomes “A pulse in the eternal mind” that “Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given.” The death imagined in the first stanza occurs in the last stanza. 

We are presented with a cleansed soul, “this heart, all evil shed away,/a pulse in the eternal mind.” The life of the soldier has been distilled to a life of goodness, and that life is owed to England. In the end, “The Soldier” celebrates the idea of self-sacrifice: according to the dead soldier, it is an honor to die for one’s country, and no thought should be given to personal desire, because the desire of the soldier and the desire of the country should be one.

2.) The Hero - Siegfried Sassoon 


   Siegfried Sassoon, born in 1886, was in service on the first day of the First World War. Although his initial poetry revealed a lot of Romantic influences, the experiences in the trenches got to him and, similarly to Owen, introduced a new sense of realism into his poetry. Sassoon himself was marked for rather reckless yet heroic actions, such as capturing a German trench in the Hindeburg-line singlehanded. But rather than report this victory, he sat down and read poetry before returning to his own camp. These kind of actions garnered him respect among his fellow soldiers, but betrayed an almost suicidal intent on advancement. 

Subject of Poem:

In the poem 'Hero', Sassoon shows the reader a mother receiving the news of her son's death from one of his comrades. The very first sentence, 'Jack fell as he'd have wished' reveals a delusion on not only the mother's side but also on society's. No one wishes to die violently, especially not in a war, and believing that they do makes parents send their children off blindly. By capitalizing 'Mother', Sassoon makes her not only the soldier's mother but also makes her a personification of Britain and its soldiers her children. Therefore it is Britain that says this sentence and deludes itself about its children. By folding up the letter sent to her, she resigns herself to the lie she has been fed, saying 'the Colonel writes so nicely'. By wrapping up a horrible truth in nice words, the Colonel manages to lull the mother into a false sense of comfort. However, the mother has a 'tired voice', as if everything up to that point has only been a long struggle, the inevitable end of which almost brings a kind of relief to her for which she feels guilty. Her voice becomes a 'choke; because in accepting the version of her son's death she has received, she prevents herself from speaking out. 

She half looked up. "We mothers are so proud of our dead soldiers." Then her face was bowed.'  

As the above two lines show, the poem is written in rhyming couplets which is very effective in bringing across moral lessons quickly. The mother's statement about her feelings leads to her 'bowed' head, to her taking a submissive pose as if she has been defeated. The archetypal picture of a mother defending her children is here undermined and leads to her subsuming herself with all the other mothers. Not only do the soldiers become faceless pawns in a game. This style also possibly mimics the loud headlines on newspapers, shouting propaganda at the reader, trying to convince them of a justification of the War. Sassoon was a big critic of the way propaganda was falsely influencing the people, and the rest of the poem serves to underline the falseness behind official communication. 

The third stanza is written from the soldier's point of view, thinking of 'Jack'. By putting the name between quotation marks, Sassoon de-personifies him and makes him a stocktype for all soldiers. On the other hand, he himself was known as 'Mad Jack' for his reckless actions and the description of 'cold-footed, useless swine' may therefore reflect on himself as well. All of them were terrified and unaware of what they were supposed to do, which led to the 'panicked' running and neglecting the 'mine' that had 'blown [him] to small bits'. The supposed message he has given to the Mother, is clearly different from the stark reality which is given to the reader in these lines. Not only did Jack try to injure himself in order to be 'sent home', he had died alone and miserable rather than a hero's death, admired by all. 'no one seemed to care' for the boys dying every single day. As a final rhyming couplet, this is extremely strong.

'And no one seemed to care,Except that lonely woman with white hair.'

It is very similar to the propaganda shouts, calling for men to stand up to defend their mothers, sisters and wives. The reality that is never explained is the mourning for these women, who are left behind alone, since all the men are off to war, and ageing with sorrow. Sassoon is considered one of the great War Poets because of the reality of the War he reveals in his poetry. Similarly to Owen, a close friend of his, he reveals the disconnect between the truth in the trenches and the truth at home. His poem leaves it perfectly in the middle where the blame could possibly lie. Both the soldier and the Colonel are lying, but so are the newspapers, both slowly making it impossible for the other to reveal the truth. 

Style of Writings: 

Written in iambic pentameter, ‘The Hero’ comprises three stanzas of six lines length largely made up of rhyming couplets, save the first four lines of the second stanza, which have an alternating rhyme scheme. Rhyming couplets, of course, are particularly effective in relaying neat epigrams or moral statements. The simplicity of the rhyme scheme perhaps apes the newspaper poetry of the time, which often went in for sentimental attitudes about the heroism of the British ‘boys’ and their sacrifice.  

Patriotism:

"I believe that the war is being deliberately prolonged by those who have the power to end it." — Siegfried Sassoon

I have seen and endured the sufferings of the troops and I can no longer be a party to prolong these sufferings for ends which I believe to be evil and unjust. I am not protesting against the conduct of the war, but against the political errors and insincerities for which the fighting men are being sacrificed.
 
“We mothers are so proud / Of our dead soldiers.’ Then her face bowed.”: The mother speaks as if for all British soldiers: perhaps the consolation that she finds in doing so is in subsuming herself in the collective loss of all the mothers of the nation. At any rate, these words do seem more sentimental than authentic: their clichéd expression helping to repress, perhaps, the great grief of the woman.

“…and how, at last, he died, / Blown to small bits.”: the grisly contrast of the soldier’s death to the heroism supposed in the poem’s title is clear. ‘Jack’ is “blown to bits” by a shell or a mine: the plosive sound, ‘b’ echoing the sound of the explosive and its effect on the unfortunate soldier. The halting rhythm of the line, with pauses following each stressed word (“how”, “last”, “died”), lends a sense of inevitability to Jack’s end.  this lines we seens some patriotism elements. 

 Both poem are similar in his poem theme and his whole concept of poetry. 

4.) Do you find any such regional poem/movies/web series/songs which can be compared to any one of the poems given here. Also, give a proper explanation of the similarity. 

Here I compare with Bollywood song नैना अश्क़ ना हो with Rupert Brookes poem  The Soldier.

नैना अश्क़ ना हो 

Naina Ashq Na Ho lyrics in Hindi & English from ‘Holiday – A Soldier Is Never Off Duty’, featuring Akshay Kumar and Sonakshi Sinha in lead roles. Directed by A R Murugadoss, the music has been composed by Pritam Chakraborty. The lyrics of Ashq Na Ho has been penned by Irshad Kamil. The song has been sung Arijit Singh.


    यूँ ना लम्हा लम्हा मेरी याद में
होके तन्हा तन्हा मेरे बाद में
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
माना कल से होंगे हम दूर
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो

नैना लौटा आने वाले साल जो
मेरी वर्दी बोले मेरा हाल तो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
ये समझना, मैं हूँ मजबूर
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो 

बीते हुए लम्हों के तारे गिनूंगा मैं
आके तुझे ख़्वाबों में तेरे मिलूंगा मैं
जब कभी हल्की हल्की बरखा आए
जब कभी दिल भी यूँही भर से जाए
जब कभी हल्की हल्की बरखा आए
उस पल झोंका इक बनके आऊंगा मैं
उस पल ज़ुल्फ़ें पलकें दामन
छू जाऊँगा मैं
ओ तेरी चूड़ी नग्में गए जो मेरे
तेरी पलकों पे हो साए जो मेरे
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
आंसू करते हमें कमज़ोर
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
 
तेरे लिए सांसें आए
तेरी लिए जाए, जाए रे… जाए रे
तेरे लिए सांसें आए
तेरी लिए जाए, जाए रे… जाए रे
रब्बा…रब्बा बैरी से बिछड़े
जाने किसने बनाए
हाय रे, हाय रे, हाय रे
दूरी तड़पाये
मेरे बाद चाहे आए याद मेरी
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो…अश्क़ ना हो हो
हो हो…

ओ लिखी खत में मैंने तुझे बात जो
सोना रख के तकिये तले रात को
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
ये जुदाई भी है दस्तूर
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो

नैना लौटा आने वाले साल जो
मेरी वर्दी बोले मेरा हाल तो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
ये समझना, मैं हूँ मजबूर
नैना अश्क़ ना हो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो  

Poem: The Soldier 

The Soldier BY RUPERT BROOKE 

If I should die, think only this of me:
      That there’s some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England. There shall be
      In that rich earth a richer dust concealed;
A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware,
      Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam;
A body of England’s, breathing English air,
      Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.

And think, this heart, all evil shed away,
      A pulse in the eternal mind, no less
            Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given;
Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day;
      And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness,
            In hearts at peace, under an English heaven. 

Comparison: 

The Soldier poem and  नैना अश्क़ ना हो song both are similar in one thing it's a soldier love for his nation and this song also suggest that how soldier going from his house to and die for his motherland.  

If I should die, think only this of me:
      That there’s some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England. 

नैना लौटा आने वाले साल जो
मेरी वर्दी बोले मेरा हाल तो
नैना अश्क़ ना हो 

If I die in the war, I want to be remembered in a particular way. Think of how the far-off land on which I die will have a small piece of England forever. That earth will be enriched by my dead body, because my body is made from dirt born in England. And the this song and this line say same thing that is how soldier think of his motherland first then his family and other things.so that way this poem and song are similar. This all things say that how soldier love his motherland. According to me this both Poems are similar in much things. 

 This is whole information about the what is war poetry.

Thank you

Thursday, March 3, 2022

Thinking Activity

 Thinking Activity: Bob Dylan and Robert Frost

This Blog is a response of thinking activity on Bob Dylan and Robert Frost, given by our professor Vaidehi Ma'am. Here i am sharing one video which was made by me by merging 5-6 small videos.And also going to write that, Which Poem or Song of Bob Dylan/Robert Frost is relatable with my Video. Why?  

🔅Bob Dylan


Bob Dylan, original name Robert Allen Zimmerman, (born May 24, 1941, Duluth, Minnesota, U.S.), American folksinger who moved from folk to rock music in the 1960s, infusing the lyrics of rock and roll, theretofore concerned mostly with boy-girl romantic innuendo, with the intellectualism of classic literature and poetry. Hailed as the Shakespeare of his generation, Dylan sold tens of millions of albums, wrote more than 500 songs recorded by more than 2,000 artists, performed all over the world, and set the standard for lyric writing. he legally changed his name to Robert Dylan in 1962 reportedly in homage to the poet Dylan Thomas. He is widely recognized as one of the greatest songwriters of the 20th century. Dylan was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2016.

Bob Dylan was inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame in 1982 and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1988. His albums Highway 61 Revisited and Blonde on Blonde, as well as the individual songs “Mr. Tambourine Man,” “Like a Rolling Stone,” and “Blowin’ in the Wind,” are in the Grammy Hall of Fame. In 2008 he was awarded a Pulitzer Prize Special Citation for his “profound impact on popular music and American culture, marked by lyrical composition of extraordinary poetic power.”

🔅Robert Frost 

  Robert Lee Frost (March 26, 1874 – January 29, 1963) was an American poet. His work was initially published in England before it was published in the United States. Known for his realistic depictions of rural life and his command of American colloquial speech, Frost frequently wrote about settings from rural life in New England in the early 20th century, using them to examine complex social and philosophical themes.Frequently honored during his lifetime, Frost is the only poet to receive four Pulitzer Prizes for Poetry. He became one of America's rare "public literary figures, almost an artistic institution".He was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal in 1960 for his poetic works. On July 22, 1961, Frost was named poet laureate of Vermont.

Among Frost's popular shorter poems are Mending Wall, Directive, Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening, The Road Not Taken, Nothing Gold Can Stay, Fire and Ice, Birches, After Apple Picking. Robert Frost won the Pulitzer Prize at 4 different times. This is an achievement unequaled by any other American poet. Robert Frost finally died in Boston on January 29th, 1963. 

Thinking Task- 

Merge the five chosen shots and upload the video on your YouTube channel with any background music you like. 




The lyrics of my music is, 

Lyrics: 

Chhote Chhote Tamashe lyrics in Hindi from movie Sanam Re (2016) sung by Shaan. The song is written by Manoj Muntashir and music composed by Jeet Ganguli. Starring Pulkit Samrat, Yami Gautam. Music label T-Series.

छोटे छोटे तमाशे
जैसे पानी बताशे
होठों से ना जाने दे

हौले हौले झरोखे चल खोले ख़ुशी के
थोड़ी हवा तो आने दे
दबे दबे पाँव ज़रा चले आओ
ये पल मिलेंगे कहाँ

ये ज़िन्दगी है और क्या
इक चुटकुला हंसदे ज़रा
ख़फ़ा ख़फ़ा क्यों है तू

छोटे छोटे तमाशे
जैसे पानी बताशे
हाथों से ना जाने दे

हौले हौले झरोखे चल खोले ख़ुशी के
थोड़ी हवा तो आने दे

थोड़ी थोड़ी जोरा जोरी
थोड़ी थोड़ी चोरी शोरी करलें
भोली भाली प्यारी प्यारी
यादें सारी झोली में आ भरलें
थोड़ी थोड़ी जोरा जोरी
थोड़ी थोड़ी चोरी शोरी करलें
भोली भाली प्यारी प्यारी
यादें सारी झोली में आ भरलें

ये ज़िन्दगी है और क्या
इक चुटकुला हंसदे ज़रा
ख़फ़ा ख़फ़ा क्यों है तू

छोटे छोटे तमाशे
जैसे पानी बताशे
होठों से ना जाने दे

हौले हौले झरोखे चल खोले ख़ुशी के
थोड़ी हवा तो आने दे

खट्टे मीठे आमों जैसे
पेड़ों से आ लम्हें सारे तोड़ें
रेशा रेशा धागा धागा
दिलों की ये मोटी माला जोड़ें
खट्टे मीठे आमों जैसे
पेड़ों से आ लम्हें सारे तोड़ें
रेशा रेशा धागा धागा
दिलों की ये मोटी माला जोड़ें 

ये ज़िन्दगी है और क्या
इक चुटकुला हंसदे ज़रा
ख़फ़ा ख़फ़ा क्यों है तू

छोटे छोटे तमाशे
जैसे पानी बताशे
होठों से ना जाने दे

हौले हौले झरोखे चल खोले ख़ुशी के
थोड़ी हवा तो आने दे 

Answer these two questions.

1.)Write down the message you want to give from your lyrics. 

Ans, I give a message from the my video that is, enjoy your life whatever happens just forget about it and just enjoy like this birds. 

Song started a beautiful morning of the day. Sun shining like all the days that song line give message that, every day morning has started like a sun shining and every human being morning started with a new hope. 

Song start with first line छोटे छोटे तमाशे जैसे पानी बताशे. This line give message that water flow are naturally should have possible people also behave like this.
 
Then third video we can seem four birds is seating on electric cable and enjoy his time together that he gave message that is enjoy your life together because this present time people not connected and that's why he gave message that always spent time on together without any reasons. 
 
then forth video one bird swim in water and enjoy alone some time then he eat his food in the water and then we see that many birds come with together and swims like a participate on race. 

Last ending my video is evening time and those suggest peaceful day are end and next day new hope come with new adventure.

   So, here i completed my activity with my opinion and I gives message to everyone enjoy your Life freely. I end with this note. 

2.) Which Poem/Song of Bob Dylan/Robert Frost is relatable with your Video. Why?

Ans, The poem Fire and Ice by Robert Frost is relatable to my video.  

     Fire and Ice

                                  BY ROBERT FROST

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice. 

This poem related to my videos lyric because this fire and ice poem give a message is don't ma angry anything and don't spoil your life in some small thing because one day world end in fire and that means one day people also death' and that time his world end. I gave message that is  don't spoil your life forgot any thing and spend time togethers. My videos give message that is enjoy life like this birds and that time you think that. which way you living your life so you can  use example of fire and ice. So this is my experience of looking natural elements in life.


Thank you

Sunday, February 20, 2022

 Thinking Activity: I.A. Richards: Verbal Analysis of poem or song or flim song lyric or hymn or devotional song.  

This Blog is response of  thinking Activity given by Professor Dr. dilip Barad sir, Here i discuss about Verbal Analysis of poem or song or flim song or devotional songs. and also my view in  Indian poetics  is based on 7 days session by Professor vinod Joshi.
   


I.A.Richards, born in 1893, is one of the greatest critics of the modern age, and has influenced a number of critics on both sides of the Atlantic. He and T.S.Eliot are pioneers in the fields of New Criticism, though they differ from each other in certain important respects. Richards is a unique figure in English literary criticism because of the originality of his ideas. Moreover, like Coleridge, Richards was also interested in philosophy. His works in literary criticism helped to lay the practical foundations and methodology of New Criticism. 

His work

  • The Meaning of Meaning – 1923
  • The Principles of Literary Criticism – 1924
  •  The Practical Criticism – 1929. 

For kinds of Meaning

He believed that poet writes to communicate, and language is the means of that communication. Language is made of words, and hence a study of words is all important if we are to understand the meaning of a work of art. This four kinds meaning is given below.

  • Sense 
  • Feeling 
  • Tone 
  • Intention 

 To him, language of poetry is purely emotive, in its original primitive state. This language affects feelings.In his methodology, a lot of importance is given to the “words”. 

In Gujarati there is three kind of meaning

  •   અભિધા: Direct Meaning. 
  • વ્યંજના: There is direct meaning but it's not usable.
  • લક્ષણા: There is no direct meaning
Four types of misunderstanding:

 1. Misunderstanding of the sense of poetry: Careless, intuitive reading (rhyme or irregular syntax)

2. Over-literal reading – prosaic reading

3. Defective scholarship 

 4. Difference in meaning of words in poetry and prose 

So let's analyse some of poem or flim song on the basis of the I A Richard theory of figurative language and Indian poetic. 

Poem Analysis: 

Lyrics Title: Behti Hawa Sa Tha Woh
Movie: 3 Idiots
Singers: Shaan, Shantanu Moitra
Lyrics: Swanand Kirkire
Music: Shantanu Moitra
Music Company: T-Series. 


बहती हवा सा था वो
उड़ती पतंग सा था वो
कहाँ गया.. उसे ढूँढो 

बहती हवा सा था वो
उड़ती पतंग सा था वो
कहाँ गया.. उसे ढूँढो

हम को तो राहें थी चलती
वो खुद अपनी राह बनता,
गिरता संभालता
मस्ती में चलता था वो

हमको कल की फिकर सताती,
वो बस आज का जश्न मनाता,
हर लम्हें को खुल के जीता था वो
कहाँ से आया था वो..
छू के हमारे दिल को 
कहाँ गया.. उसे ढूँढो....

सुलगती धुप में छाओं के जैसा,
रेगिस्तान में गाँव के जैसा,
मन के घाव पे मरहम जैसा था वो
हम सहमें से रहते कूएं में,
वो नदिया में गोते लगता,
उलटी धरा चीर के तैरता था वो
बादल आवारा था वो..
यार हमारा था वो.. 
 कहाँ गया.. उसे ढूँढो...

हम को तो राहें थी चलती
वो खुद अपनी राह बनता,
गिरता संभालता
मस्ती में चलता था वो

हमको कल की फिकर सताती,
वो बस आज का जश्न मनाता,
हर लम्हें को खुल के जीता था वो
कहाँ से आया था वो..
छू के हमारे दिल को 
कहाँ गया.. उसे ढूँढो....

Scientific Reading - Misunderstanding of poetry  

When we do over literal reading, one may find it problematic to understand this poem because of the metaphors and similes it uses. For example song time and again refers to Hero as like moving air, flying kite, village in desert etc. One may question that how can a real person be like all this things ?

But this is overlitetal reading, scientific reading. But in literature, one has to understand the importance of metaphorical language. It is the metaphorical language through which we have to read this poem. This is the core ides discussed by I.A.Richard in the present article.this line is example of લક્ષણા. લક્ષણા means There is no direct meaning. Here, first  line  बेहती हवा सा था वो। उडती पतंग सा वो। those line say a direct meaning of  the words. 

Indian poetics:

અભિધા: Direct Meaning. 

हमको कल की फिकर सताती,
वो बस आज का जश्न मनाता,
हर लम्हें को खुल के जीता था वो 

This line say a direct meaning of abhidha  we all are worried about future life but the poet say that life is enjoy in present time.  So this is example of abhidha because this lines gives direct meaning of words. 

વ્યંજના: There is direct meaning but it's not usable.   

सुलगती धुप में छाओं के जैसा,
रेगिस्तान में गाँव के जैसा,
मन के घाव पे मरहम जैसा था वो
हम सहमें से रहते कूएं में,
वो नदिया में गोते लगता,
उलटी धरा चीर के तैरता था वो 

This line say a direct meaning of the words and also this all are the line problematic because सुलगती धुप में छाओं के‌ जैसा, रेगिस्तान में गांव के जैसा। How that's things possible because सुलगती धुप it's means hot weather and sun shining so that time छाओं means cold one time both weather not come together. 

લક્ષણા: There is no direct meaning. 

बहती हवा सा था वो
उड़ती पतंग सा था वो 

बहती हवा सा था वो, This lines say a indirect meaning because here poet use this word in metaphors it's means poet use not a direct meaning but indirect. and same thing use also next line. Because  बहती हवा it's means moving air, उड़ती पतंग it's means flying like kite in sky so person not as a part of naturel things and this all are not anyway possible. It is a best example of લક્ષણા. 

This all things are suggeste that how we all readers change poet thought and his real meaning . And that's why this all misunderstanding are happening to understand this song and his meaning. And this way Indian poetics also help us. And this way Indian poetics also help us to understand I. A. Richards Verbal Analysis.

Tuesday, February 1, 2022

Thinking Activity

Criticism: I A Richard "Practical Criticism" - Reading Poems 

This Blog task is the response of Reading selective poem and analyze from the reference of I.A.Richards's 'Practical Criticism' given by Prof.Dr.Dilip Barad Sir.Here I Sher my opinion on criticism and also Sher critical view of the poem Nazm: Ye Khel kya hai.

Practical criticism is, like the formal study of English literature itself, a relatively young discipline. It began in the 1920s with a series of experiments by the Cambridge critic I.A. Richards. He gave poems to students without any information about who wrote them or when they were written. In Practical Criticism of 1929 he reported on and analysed the results of his experiments. The objective of his work was to encourage students to concentrate on 'the words on the page', rather than relying on preconceived or received beliefs about a text. For Richards this form of close analysis of anonymous poems was ultimately intended to have psychological benefits for the students: by responding to all the currents of emotion and meaning in the poems and passages of prose which they read the students were to achieve what Richards called an 'organised response'. This meant that they would clarify the various currents of thought in the poem and achieve a corresponding clarification of their own emotions.

I.A. Richards notes that language of poetry is Figurative/ metaphorical/ symbolical and personified one. Language of poetry is connotative , not denotative. Meaning lies in the context. So while reading the poetry reader should be aware about this things otherwise there is possibility of Over- literal/ scientific reading, which may lead the reader to the totally different meaning than the intended one of the poem. 

 He believed that poet writes to communicate, and language is the means of that communication. Language is made of words, and hence a study of words is all important if we are to understand the meaning of a work of art. Words carry four kinds of meaning: Sense, Feelings, Tone and Intentions. Here, I discuss  my reading view of the poem Nazm- Ye Khel kya hai.

Analysis of poem: Nazm - Ye khel kya hai ( ये खेल क्या है ) by Javed akhtar

This nazm by Javed Akhtar (from his book of poems ‘Lava’) captures the notion of existential angst through the metaphor of a game of chess. He questions the contradictions of life, of social oppression and injustice through his thoughts about the rules of chess.

Nazm - Ye khel kya hai  
    ( नज़्म - ये खेल क्या है )

ये खेल क्या है
मिरे मुखालिफ़ ने चाल चल दी है 
और अब
मेरी चाल के इंतेज़ार में है
मगर मैं कब से
सफ़ेद खानों
सियाह खानों में रक्खे
काले-सफ़ेद मोहरों को देखता हूँ
मैं सोचता हूँ
ये मोहरे क्या हैं
अगर मैं समझूँ
कि ये जो मोहरे हैं
सिर्फ लकड़ी के हैं खिलौने
तो जीतना क्या है हारना क्या
न ये ज़रूरी
न वो अहम है
अगर खुशी है न जीतने की
न हारने का ही कोई ग़म है
तो खेल क्या है
मैं सोचता हूँ
जो खेलना है
तो अपने दिल में यक़ीन कर लूँ
ये मोहरे सचमुच के बादशाहो-वज़ीर
सचमुच के हैं प्यादे
और इनके आगे है
दुश्मनों की वो फ़ौज
रखती है जो कि मुझको तबाह करने के
सारे मनसूबे
सब इरादे
मगर मैं ऐसा जो मान भी लूँ
तो सोचता हूँ
ये खेल कब है
ये जंग है जिसको जीतना है
ये जंग है जिसमें सब है जायज़
कोई ये कहता है जैसे मुझसे
ये जंग भी है
ये खेल भी है
ये जंग है पर खिलाड़ियों की
ये खेल है जंग की तरह का
मैं सोचता हूँ
जो खेल है
इसमें इस तरह का उसूल क्यों है
कि कोई मोहरा रहे कि जाए
मगर जो है बादशाह
उसपर कभी कोई आँच भी न आए
वज़ीर ही को है बस इजाज़त
कि जिस तरफ़ भी वो चाहे जाए
मैं सोचता हूँ
जो खेल है
इसमें इस तरह का उसूल क्यों है
प्यादा जो अपने घर से निकले
पलट के वापस न जाने पाए
मैं सोचता हूँ
अगर यही है उसूल
तो फिर उसूल क्या है
अगर यही है ये खेल
तो फिर ये खेल क्या है
मैं इन सवालों से जाने कब से उलझ रहा हूँ
मिरे मुखालिफ़ ने चाल चल दी है
और अब मेरी चाल के इंतेज़ार में है।
 
                

Thinking Activity

Thinking Activity: Understanding the Zeitgeist of the 20th century: from Modern Times to the era of Great Dictator

 This blog i have written in a response of Thinking Activity. In this blog i am going to discuss about the important frames in Charles Chaplin's "Modern Times" and "The Great Dictator" 

"Modern Times"

Modern Times” is a silent black and white film, performed and directed by Charles Chaplin in 1936. The film is of both slapstick and satire, and is a socio-economic commentary on American society during the thirties, a period of rapid industrialization and the onset of the Great Depression. In the film, he plays a character known as the Tramp: a happy-go-lucky underdog, who does not quite understand society, and yet remains both cheerful and hopeful despite facing innumerable difficulty. In Modern Times, he portrays the reign of technology and society where humanity is forced to adjust to the machines and institutions of modern society, particularly with advent of the  Dream’ and the ‘pursuit of happiness’.

1931 Charles Chaplin told a newspaper interviewer :

“Unemployment is the vital question . . . Machinery should benefit mankind. It should not spell tragedy and throw it out of work.”

Chaplin, who was always very attentive to the economic and social problems of his day, declared in 1931: ‘unemployment, that’s the key question. Machines should do improve the well-being of humanity, instead of causing tragedy and unemployment”. 
 Ironically, the film opens with a cardboard on which is inscribed a bombastic sentence: “a story about the industry, individual initiative and the crusade of humanity in the pursuit of happiness”.

The significance of the first screen shows the time of 6 o'clock. And the time shows six o’clock is the time of leaving the factory/ industry.

Then the first frame of  sheep and second frames of fectory workers. Factories and mills were being equipped with new inventions of technology and machines were occupying the human jobs. Due to this unemployment, many people were roaming like sheep without direction.

Charlie is a factory worker in this hectic age. His job -mechanically tightening bolts on a moving belt. He crazy for his work.

This scene suggest that mind and money power is greater than muscles power.and that is best example of upper class fectory workers.

In his office, the President is shown a new aid to productivity - a method to shorten the lunch hour break and improve worker productivity. The sales pitch for a feeding machine is delivered by a mechanical salesman on a phonograph record:

a practical device which automatically feeds your men while at work. Don't stop for lunch. Be ahead of your competitor. The Billows feeding machine will eliminate the lunch hour, increase your production, and decrease your overhead.

The device is a mechanical, automated, aerodynamically-styled, silent feeding machine which features a revolving table, an automaton soup plate, an automatic food pusher, a revolving low and high gear corncob feeder, and a hydro-compressed sterilized mouth wipe. 

This film has a scene that depict great differences between social classes. There's a moment of parallelism between reality and a dream. A moment in which Chaplin and his partner are happily lying on the grass, then they saw a typical modern married couple. The man leaving home and going to work, and the wife staying house. They first joke and parody the situation, but then they dream about it. They imagine them in a real house, with food, comfort and all facilities. 

Can you imagine us in a little home like that?” – Chapplin

Then they stop fantasizing and return to rude reality, they were homeless, without work, starving and alone.

this scene we see that Trump read newspaper that is news for fectory reopen and he thinks that new hope come his life and his dream come true.

After becoming free from jail a sheriff writes a recommendation letter, and on the basis of that letter he get a job at departmental store as a timekeeper. People are easily trust the letter. But present time people not easyly trust that type of letter and not give any job for workers. 

Sunday, January 30, 2022

Thinking Activity

Movie Screening:" Vita and Virginia" by Chanya Button.

Here is a blog based on Virginia Woolf’s life, an incident that turns out to be a novel of hers “Orlando: A Biography”, an understanding of Sex/Gender/Orientation and a movie based on Virginia Woolf and a female lover.
   


Vita & Virginia is a 2018 biographical romantic drama film directed by Chanya Button. The screenplay, written by Button and Eileen Atkins, is adapted from the 1992 play Vita & Virginia by Atkins. The film stars Gemma Arterton, Elizabeth Debicki, and Isabella Rossellini. Set in the 1920s, Vita & Virginia tells the story of the love affair between Vita Sackville-West and Virginia Woolf.

The film had its world premiere as a Special Presentation at the Toronto International Film Festival on 11 September 2018. It was released in the United Kingdom on 5 July 2019, and in the United States on 23 August 2019.

1, How far do you feel that Orlando is influenced by Vita and Virginia’s love affair? Does it talk only about that or do you find anything else too?

“I am reduced to a thing that wants Virginia…It is incredible how essential to me you have become,” wrote Vita Sackville-West to the novelist Virginia Woolf in 1926. A popular writer herself, Sackville-West was proclaiming her love for Woolf during the most intense years of their romantic relationship in the 1920s. Although both were married to men, the two women penned hundreds of poetic letters to each other, and their relationship would inspire one of Woolf’s most celebrated works, the 1928 novel Orlando.


As Woolf wrote in her diary: “A biography beginning in the year 1500 and continuing to the present day, called Orlando. Vita; only with a change about from one sex to the other.”

Orlando is not the first piece of fiction about a sex change. Ovid’s Metamorphoses is a playful and serious treatise on the shiftability of form – especially human form, as humans turn into trees or animals, or the gods embody themselves as human to pursue their love interests. In The Arabian Nights, there are both gender switching plots and cross-dressing. Shakespeare loved gender disguises – a girl who’s a boy who’s a boy who’s a girl – and of course as women were not allowed on the London stage in Shakespeare’s day, every female role was cross-gender. Every romance is a bromance.

Woolf’s Orlando begins his journey as a young man living at Knole, the great house in Kent that Sackville-West could not inherit because she was female. The novel starts in an attic, as the young Orlando slices at the preserved head of a Moor. It also begins with a famously disingenuous sentence: “He, for there could be no doubt about his sex … ” and then we spend the rest of the novel doubting exactly that.

Orlando manages his transition with grace and a profound truth. On seeing himself as a herself for the first time in the mirror, she remarks: “Different sex. Same person.”

The relationship was clearly a source of inspiration for both women, but it was Woolf’s 1928 novel Orlando that would cement her status as an established writer and her legacy as a master of modernism. Spanning over 300 years, the novel features a protagonist who switches gender in a fantastical exploration of the self and the other. The book was described as “the longest and most charming love letter in literature” by Vita’s son Nigel Nicholson, and others have called it “the first trans novel in the English language.”

In a 1927 diary entry, Woolf wrote that she was writing Orlando “half in mock style very clear and plain, so that people will understand every word. But the balance between truth and fantasy must be careful. It is based on Vita.” The work was so personal that Woolf wrote to Sackville-West asking for her permission. Vita replied, “My God Virginia, if ever I was thrilled and terrified it is at the prospect of being projected into the shape of Orlando.”

The unexpected result of Vita’s lapses in fidelity, drawn out over a period of several months, was one of the most personal “biographies” in literary history: the fictional account of Vita’s life that was Orlando.

Vita readily agreed. as the writing flowed, Orlando became a version of Vita that, while completely recognizable to anyone who knew her, was also purely Virginia’s; a creation that could not be taken from her, who was safe beyond the lure of other women.It also posed some interesting questions for Virginia as she withdrew, busy writing the fictional Orlando / Vita into existence while the real Vita was continuing to see Mary Campbell. She often wondered in her diary which was the more real.
Their son Nigel would later refer to the book as “the longest and most charming love letter in literature.” Only Vita’s mother disliked it, writing to Virginia, “… probably you do not realise how cruel you have been.”
With Orlando, though, Vita felt as if Virginia truly had “found her out.” All aspects of her character, including those she usually kept hidden even from herself, had been laid bare. She felt as if there was nothing that could now be kept from Virginia.
Reviewers and the reading public were aware that Orlando was based on Sackville-West, and that the book’s gender-switching plot alluded to her bisexual relationships. “People knew it was Vita, and they thought it was fun and playful; that’s why people bought it,” says Smith. Not everyone agreed — as depicted in Vita & Virginia by Isabella Rossellini, Vita’s mother Baroness Sackville was horrified by Orlando, writing that she loathed Woolf for “having changed my Vita and taken her away from me.”

Smith has been teaching Orlando to students for more than two decades, and she says that even though the book was written in the 1920s, it speaks to relevant themes about gender and sexuality now. “It forces students to consider ideas about gender that they hadn’t really considered before,” she says. “Queer theory, being queer and that way of thinking of one’s self have changed pretty radically; it’s part of the discourse of everyday lives in a way that they weren’t 25 years ago. Woolf is just such a marvelous writer, and the way she talks about time and the issues of the self in Orlando are pertinent still.”

2, Who do you think is confused about their identity Vita or Virginia? Explain with illustrations
  

Who were Virginia Woolf and Vita Sackville-West?

Virginia Woolf

Born in London in 1882, Adeline Virginia Stephen, or “Ginia” as she was affectionately known, had a love for arts and literature running through her family. Her sister Vanessa was an artist, and when they reached adulthood, the two sisters became the heart of an influential intellectual circle known as the Bloomsbury Group, a collective of radical artists, writers and thinkers during the early 20th century. In 1912, Virginia married Leonard Woolf, a politically active left-wing writer and university friend of her brother’s. While Virginia Woolf’s earlier novels, which included Night and Day (1919), Mrs Dalloway (1925) and To the Lighthouse (1927), were not hugely commercially or critically successful during her time, she is today respected as one of the most important writers of the 20th century and a pioneer of “stream of consciousness” writing.

Vita Sackville

The glamorous writer Vita Sackville-West was 10 years younger than Woolf and came from an aristocratic family. The Sackvilles’ ancestral home was Knole, a sprawling estate in southern England, and Sackville-West was always frustrated that she would never be able to inherit Knole due to her gender, as English aristocratic custom forbid it. (This was a point that Woolf highlighted in perhaps her most openly political and feminist work, the 1929 essay A Room of One’s Own, in which she advocated for women to be financially independent.) Sackville-West married diplomat Harold Nicholson in 1913, who would, like his wife, also come to have same-sex affairs outside of their marriage. In 1917, Sackville-West caused scandal in high society when she eloped with her lover Violet Trefusis to Europe; the pair spent two years on-and-off running away together and being brought back to England by disgruntled family members.

“They came from pretty different places,” says Victoria L. Smith, a professor of English at Texas State University. “That might have provided some of the attraction to Virginia for Vita, certainly. Vita was very attracted to Virginia’s genius.”

I think Virginia is confused about their identity because  As depicted in the film, after meeting Woolf, Sackville-West decided to publish her books with Hogarth Press, which was the Woolfs’ own small independent publishing house. Sackville-West’s books were commercially and critically the more successful during her and Woolf’s lifetimes, although today Woolf’s work is more highly regarded. In 1924, Sackville-West published her short story Seducers in Ecuador with Hogarth Press to help with the Woolfs’ mounting debts, and she followed it six years later with novel The Edwardians, which was a financial success. “Vita sold all these books, but people just didn’t really understand Virginia Woolf’s writing,” says Smith. But Sackville-West recognized that Woolf was the better writer, writing to her in 1925 that “I contrast my illiterate writing with your scholarly one, and am ashamed.”
“I think that Virginia Woolf recognized that she was quite a bit of a better writer than Vita ever could be,” Smith says. “I don’t think Woolf was jealous of Sackville-West’s writing, but she was jealous of her ability to be all these other things: to be a mother, to be beautiful, to have this sense of confidence that Woolf lacked at times about her being in the world, versus her writing.”

3, What is society’s thought about women and identity? Do you agree with them? If Yes then why? If no then why?

Yes, I not agree with them because,“Their relationship was very passionate and very sexual, even though initially their sexual relationship was downplayed and even ignored,” says Smith. And while the two women were open about their relationship, it was also during a time when British society was more socially conservative. While male homosexuality in the U.K. was still a criminal offense at the time, there was no equivalent legislation that targeted gay women. However, in 1921, some lawmakers voted to criminalize “sexual acts of gross indecency” between women, although the law was never passed because politicians feared it would encourage women to explore homosexuality.

Smith says their relationship was hugely significant on Woolf, as Sackville-West made her feel appreciated and adored: “Virginia deeply loved Vita, and she was so happy to recognize in Vita that Vita loved and celebrated women.” In the film, Woolf is depicted as finding it initially difficult to be sexually intimate with Sackville-West; some scholars have suggested this hesitation in real life was because Woolf was a survivor of childhood sexual abuse perpetrated by male members of her family. And while Virginia still loved her husband Leonard, he too saw that Vita had a profound impact on his wife’s life, and her work, and he did not object to their relationship.
A new study exploring the attitudes toward nonheterosexual men and women in 23 Western and non-Western countries found lesbians are more accepted than gay men around the world.

“We found that gay men are disliked more than lesbian women in every country we tested,” according to the study, which was conducted by three New York University psychologists and published in the December issue of the journal Social Psychology and Personality Science.world.Sexual minorities face pervasive discrimination and hostility globally, with same-sex sexual activity still illegal in approximately 70 countries.

4, What are your views on Gender Identity? Will you like to give any message to society?

Gender identity is the personal sense of one's own gender.Gender identity can correlate with a person's assigned sex or can differ from it. In most individuals, the various biological determinants of sex are congruent, and consistent with the individual's gender identity.Gender expression typically reflects a person's gender identity, but this is not always the case.While a person may express behaviors, attitudes, and appearances consistent with a particular gender role, such expression may not necessarily reflect their gender identity. The term gender identity was coined by Robert J. Stoller in 1964 and popularized by John Money.

Gender identity is defined as a personal conception of oneself as male or female (or rarely, both or neither). This concept is intimately related to the concept of gender role, which is defined as the outward manifestations of personality that reflect the gender identity. Gender identity, in nearly all instances, is self-identified, as a result of a combination of inherent and extrinsic or environmental factors; gender role, on the other hand, is manifested within society by observable factors such as behavior and appearance. For example, if a person considers himself a male and is most comfortable referring to his personal gender in masculine terms, then his gender identity is male. However, his gender role is male only if he demonstrates typically male characteristics in behavior, dress, and/or mannerism.
Gender identity is usually formed by age three.After age three, it is extremely difficult to change gender identity.Both biological and social factors have been suggested to influence its formation.
 

5,Write a note on the direction of the movie. Which symbols and space caught your attention while watching the moive?

Vita & Virginia” wastes the talents of four people—its two subjects and the two women that play them. It is a deeply frustrating movie, a film that not only can’t find the right tone from scene to scene but feels disjointed in individual moments too. It is a bit of a chamber piece, a bit of a romance, a bit of a commentary on creativity, a bit of social commentary, even a bit of magical realism. At a certain point, I started to wonder if the disjointed nature of “Vita & Virginia” was designed purposefully to replicate the structure and themes of Woolf’s Orlando, but decided I was giving a messy movie too much credit. Sometimes a mess is just a mess.

I loved Virginia's character, she was able to act out even the slightest detail in every emotion which made it so easy for me to empathize with her character. The storyline was incredible yet somewhat tragic, and I love how this was based off of real letters between Vita and Virginia.

6, Vita and Virginia" had to be made into Bollywood Adaptation, who do you think would be fit for the role of Vita and Virginia?

If Vita and Virginia would be a Bollywood adaptation, I would select:

Deepika Padukone in the role of Virginia Woolf and
Katrina kaif in the role of Vita Sackville.

Everyone shall share their blog link with any one of your favourite quotes by Virginia Woolf on Social Media with the hashtag #virginiaandme.

# Virginiaandme
      



Thank you

Assignment

Assignment writing: Paper 210A Research Project Writing: Dissertation Writing   Dissertation Topic: "Reading 'New India' in F...